The Libertarian Case for Voting NO on San Antonio Propositions

As San Antonio voters prepare to decide on several ballot propositions, we’re sharing a breakdown of each measure—and why libertarians advocate a “no” vote on ALL propositions:

Proposition A: Enhancing the City’s Ethics Process

This measure would expand the role of the Ethics Review Board, adding new definitions and funding, and allowing it to review cases addressed by other agencies. A libertarian position favors keeping bureaucracy minimal; thus, vote NO to limit redundant oversight and to discourage government from expanding its influence over individual actions.

Proposition B: Modernizing Language in the City Charter

Prop B proposes updating “archaic language” in the City Charter. However, without clear details on what language would be changed, this measure risks unnecessary revisions. The libertarian stance is to vote NO to avoid vague and potentially costly government initiatives.

Proposition C: City Manager Term and Pay

Currently, the city manager’s salary and tenure are capped. This proposal would allow the City Council to set these terms. Libertarians support limited government and oppose unchecked spending, so a no vote helps ensure taxpayer dollars aren’t freely allocated to inflated salaries. Did you know City of San Antonio is over $18.5 billion in debt? Is that worthy of a pay raise?

Proposition D: City Employee Political Activity

Prop D would allow city employees to engage in political activities outside of work hours. While encouraging freedom, this measure also risks the appearance of bias within the government. Libertarians advocate a NO vote to preserve impartiality in public service and minimize political influence within city operations.

Proposition E: City Council Pay Increase

This proposition seeks to increase city council and mayoral pay, with future adjustments based on median income. Libertarians believe elected roles should prioritize service, not profit. A NO vote emphasizes fiscal responsibility and opposes pay raises that are not voter-driven. Did you know City of San Antonio is over $18.5 billion in debt? Is that worthy of a pay raise?

Proposition F: City Council Terms Extension

Prop F would extend council and mayoral terms from two to four years while maintaining an eight-year limit. Longer terms reduce voter accountability and entrench political power. Libertarians support a NO vote to maintain shorter terms that encourage responsiveness to voters.

In every case, these propositions propose expanding government influence or spending taxpayer money in ways that may not align with the principles of liberty and limited government. This election, we encourage you to vote NO on all propositions to uphold a government focused on efficiency, transparency, and individual freedoms.

The Libertarian Case for Voting NO on San Antonio Propositions Read More »

Scroll to Top